Revolutionary Designs

Human app-store preflight · Apple & Google

Before Apple or Google sees your app, a human should.

AppShield compares the runnable build and submission materials you provide—listing copy, screenshots, privacy and rating answers, account and purchase flows, and reviewer access—then returns a prioritized, source-linked fix list within 24–48 hours of complete intake.

Request a review — $99 Read the sample report

One app · one store · one submitted build · no approval promise.

Example review summary Fix before submitting

Your submission tells three different stories.

A human connects details that isolated scanners and AI builders commonly miss.

Visible conflict Store screenshot no longer matches the current build Specific correction: replace the outdated paywall image and retest the screenshot sequence.
Missing evidence Account-deletion path cannot be initiated The report records the tested path, device, build, and current official source.
Declaration mismatch Privacy answer conflicts with an observed permission flow You get the evidence, the risk, a recommended correction, and a retest condition.
See the abridged sample report →
✓ Personally reviewed ✓ Every finding cites evidence ✓ Policy and best practice separated
Independent human review for the build, listing, and declarations your app builder should not grade alone.

One review · three surfaces

Your submission is a system, not a checklist.

Reviewers see the app, the storefront, and your declarations together. AppShield does the same within a clearly recorded test scope.

01

The runnable build

What a reviewer can actually reach and understand in the supplied build.

  • Onboarding and core flows
  • Account creation and deletion path
  • Pricing, entitlements, and management paths
  • Permissions, errors, and reviewer access
02

The store package

What your listing promises before anyone installs the app.

  • Name, subtitle, and description
  • Screenshots and previews
  • Support and privacy links
  • Release notes and reviewer instructions
03

The declarations

Whether your draft answers agree with the evidence you supplied.

  • Privacy and Data Safety answers
  • Age-rating questionnaire
  • SDK and data inventory
  • Purchases, ads, and user content

Built with AI?

Do not ask the builder to grade its own work.

Fast builders are excellent at producing screens and code. Submission risk often lives in the seams: a permission the privacy answer forgot, an old screenshot, or reviewer access that fails outside your own device.

✓Evidence over confidence. Findings name what was observed and where.
✓Sources over folklore. Policy claims link to current Apple or Google documentation.
✓Limits over theater. Anything not tested or not provable is marked that way.

How the review works

A review you can audit.

01

Define the evidence

We confirm the store, build, device, OS, locale, user role, test access, submission drafts, and anything that cannot be tested.

02

Review and compare

A human walks the agreed flows, compares the three surfaces, and separates policy requirements, platform guidance, and best practice.

03

Fix and retest

You receive prioritized findings with evidence, current sources, a specific recommended correction, and a retest condition.

Human preflight · introductory price through Oct 31, 2026

Single-store human preflight

A deliberately narrow scope so the evidence and turnaround stay real.

  • One app and one store
  • One submitted build
  • One primary locale and standard user role
  • Up to 12 core screens or flows
  • Prioritized, source-linked PDF report
  • One clarification round and one focused recheck

Additional roles, locales, device families, regional variants, or complex apps require separate scope. AppShield identifies visible conflicts and missing evidence; it does not certify compliance or predict approval.

Introductory price $99 Scopes accepted and paid by October 31, 2026. Standard rate afterward: $149. Request a review Already approved? Pay securely Checkout requires the approved scope ID from your acceptance email. Payment does not expand the written scope.

Free source-only checker

Need the quick Android check first?

This browser tool implements three focused checks: target SDK, Google Play Billing Library major version, and a heuristic warning for alternative-payment code. It does not review your listing, declarations, screenshots, backend, or runtime behavior.

Upcoming Google Play deadline August 31, 2026 Google Play requires new apps and app updates to target API level 36 on this date, with an extension to November 1, 2026 available in Play Console. Verify with Google's target API policy and the Billing Library FAQ.
✓ Files stay in your browser ✓ Three focused checks ✓ Official Google sources
Our research registry currently tracks 86 items; this live checker implements three of them.

Drop files or a project folder here

build.gradle · build.gradle.kts · libs.versions.toml · AndroidManifest.xml

Up to 400 files, 2 MB each, scanned locally.

Checker results

Your checker results will appear here.

Get notified when a policy actually changes.

One email when an Apple or Google policy change affects shipped apps. Nothing else.

Who reviews your app

Revo Lue Shin

Revo Lue Shin, founder of AppShield

Every final report is personally reviewed and signed by Revo. Findings show the supplied evidence, tested scope, source checked date, and anything that could not be evaluated.

AppShield is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or an authorized reviewer for Apple or Google. Read the methodology and honest limits.